A Comparison of the Best Paid Music Promotion Tools to Promote Your Music Online (2025 Edition)

In today’s music industry, having great songs is only half the battle—music promotion is essential to get your tracks heard. Independent artists often act as their own marketing team, using various music marketing tools to build an audience. The good news is there are many services that can help. In this article, we explore the best music promotion services available, focusing on paid music promotion tools that deliver results. We’ll cover a mix of playlist promotion services, social media promotion platforms, and all-in-one marketing solutions – including emerging tools like Hypeddit and un:hurd music (www.unhurdmusic.com). By comparing features, pricing, pros, and cons, you can find the right services to promote your music online effectively.

1. un:hurd music – Data-Driven All-in-One Music Marketing Platform

un:hurd music (styled as un:hurd) is a newcomer rapidly becoming a top choice for independent artists. It’s an all-in-one music marketing platform specializing in automated campaigns and insights. Un:hurd combines several tools under one roof – from guided promotional planning to playlist pitching and even advertising – making it a one-stop solution for artists who want to level up their reach. The platform uses data and AI to help target the right audience for your music and streamline your promotion workflow.

One standout feature of un:hurd music is its “release cycle” tool, which provides step-by-step guidance and templates for each stage of your release. This means from the moment you finish a song, un:hurd suggests what to do next (like social media teasers, pre-saves, etc.), all the way through post-release marketing. Un:hurd also offers a built-in network of playlist curators across genres that you can pitch to directly​ (unhurdmusic.com). In other words, the platform doesn’t just tell you what to do—it actually helps you do it by connecting you with curators (for playlist placement) and providing tools to run ads and track fan engagement. It’s a comprehensive approach that bridges strategy and execution.

Pricing: un:hurd’s pricing is accessible. They have an Essentials plan that is essentially free to join (you pay per use for certain features), a Pro plan around $10 per month (approximately £9.99 in the UK) for unlimited access to core features, and a top-tier Select plan for bespoke campaigns. On the free Essentials tier, artists can use the platform with some limits – for example, playlist pitching costs about £6.99 per pitch on this tier, and there’s a small booking fee for using the automated ad tools. Upgrading to the Pro plan waives those extra fees (no ad booking fee) and even applies discounts (around 25% off) on playlist pitches. The Pro membership also unlocks lifetime data analytics (instead of just 7-day snapshots) and provides direct access to marketing experts (including an introductory coaching call). For established artists or labels, the custom Select plan offers hands-on campaign management by the un:hurd team.

Pros: un:hurd music offers an impressive breadth of features under one platform. You get the benefit of data-driven guidance (so you’re not guessing what promotion steps to take) and practical tools to execute those steps immediately. The integrated playlist pitching is a huge plus – artists have reported high success rates and significant Spotify growth using un:hurd’s pitching (with some seeing 75% of their targeted playlists accept their song, according to testimonials). The platform’s focus on analytics and “smart targeting” helps ensure you reach the right listeners rather than blindly promoting to random audiences. Another pro is its affordability: the basic functionality can be used free (pay-as-you-go) and the Pro plan is reasonably priced for the value, making advanced marketing techniques accessible to DIY artists. Partnerships with services like CD Baby and SoundCloud also indicate un:hurd is well-connected in the industry, potentially adding more value to subscribers.

Cons: As a newer service, un:hurd music is still growing its network and feature set. The playlist pitching, while effective, does cost per pitch – meaning if you plan to pitch many playlists, those fees can add up (though they’re lower with a Pro subscription). Unlike some standalone playlist services, you may have slightly fewer curators to choose from (since un:hurd’s network is curated for quality, it might not yet match the sheer volume of SubmitHub’s 2,000+ outlets). Additionally, because un:hurd packs so many features, there can be a learning curve to take full advantage of everything (the guided approach helps, but some users might feel overwhelmed at first by all the tools available). That said, un:hurd is constantly updating (even planning an AI Marketing Assistant feature soon) and is backed by industry investors, so it’s quickly ironing out any early kinks. Overall, for artists who want a comprehensive music marketing tool, un:hurd stands out as the top choice in 2025.

2. SubmitHub – Playlist & Blog Submission Marketplace

SubmitHub is often the first name artists hear when looking for playlist promotion services or blog placements. Launched in 2015, it essentially created the template for modern music submission platforms. SubmitHub allows you to send your songs directly to a huge list of curators – including Spotify playlisters, music bloggers, radio DJs, and even YouTube channel owners – all in one place. The platform guarantees that curators will listen to your submission (if you use paid credits), providing a level of assurance that your song won’t just end up in someone’s inbox abyss.

The process is straightforward: you upload your track (via a link from Spotify, YouTube, or SoundCloud) and then choose which curators or influencers you want to pitch. SubmitHub provides detailed profiles and statistics for each curator, so you can see their genre preferences, acceptance rate, follower count, etc. This transparency helps you target the most relevant outlets for your music. When you submit, if you’ve used premium credits, the curator must listen and respond within 48 hours, either by approving (sharing your music) or declining with feedback. This quick feedback cycle is valuable; even if you get a rejection, you often receive a brief comment on why the song wasn’t a fit.

Pricing: SubmitHub operates on a credit system. One premium credit costs roughly $1 (prices can drop slightly when buying in bundles), and it takes 1-3 credits to submit to one curator depending on that curator’s rank and response rate​ (twostorymelody.com). Most standard outlets charge 2 credits (≈$2) per submission. There’s also a completely free option where you use “standard” credits that regenerate slowly, but those submissions are not guaranteed a listen or timely response – so most serious users opt for paid credits. In essence, you might spend $10 to $20 (10–20 credits) to pitch a single track to a curated list of 10 or so outlets of your choice. It’s a pay-per-submission model with no subscription required, which is great for budgeting per release.

Pros: SubmitHub’s biggest strength is its large network of curators and influencers. As of recent counts, it boasts nearly 3,000 active curators, covering practically every genre and niche​. If there’s a specific audience for your music, chances are there’s a SubmitHub curator catering to them. The platform is also extremely transparent – you can see each curator’s stats (e.g. what percentage of songs they approve, average response time, etc.) and even read other artists’ feedback on them. This data-driven approach means you can strategize your submissions for better results. Another pro is the guaranteed feedback (for paid submissions); you won’t be left wondering if a curator heard your track. The feedback, while sometimes terse, can provide insight or at least closure. SubmitHub is also relatively affordable because you pay per submission – you could spend as little as a few dollars on a small campaign, or scale up as needed, making it flexible for different budgets. Lastly, it’s multi-purpose: not only one of the best Spotify promotion services (via indie playlists), it’s also widely used for blog PR outreach and even label A&R in some cases.

Cons: The obvious downside is that approval isn’t guaranteed. You might spend $20 on credits and end up with mostly polite rejections. An average approval rate might be 10-20% for well-targeted submissions (it varies by genre and song quality), so it can take persistence and some budget to land multiple placements. The feedback from curators, while guaranteed, can sometimes be very generic or subjective (“I didn’t feel the track” or “not a fit for my playlist”), which may not always be actionable. There’s also a risk of curators who are overwhelmed with submissions – some artists feel that certain curators click “Decline” with a boilerplate message just to earn their small fee. Another con is that SubmitHub focuses on pitching individual curators one by one; this manual approach requires time and research to use effectively (though the site’s filters and data help a lot). In short, SubmitHub is a powerful tool for DIY promotion, but success depends on the music’s fit and the effort you put into targeting the right curators. It’s best used alongside other strategies for a well-rounded campaign.

3. Playlist Push – Premium Spotify Playlist Campaigns

Playlist Push is a paid service focused on getting your song onto independent Spotify playlists. Unlike SubmitHub, which is micro and manual, Playlist Push works more like a full-service campaign—you pay a set fee and they handle pitching your track to a network of playlist curators. It’s known as one of the premier (and pricier) options for Spotify promotion. If your goal is to see a spike in streams and followers on Spotify specifically, and you have a budget to invest, Playlist Push is a go-to platform.

When you run a Playlist Push campaign, you choose the general genre of your track and some targeting info, and then their system sends your song to a selection of Spotify playlist curators that match your style. These curators (who have signed up with Playlist Push to receive music) will listen and decide if your song fits their playlist. Over a campaign period (usually a couple of weeks), you’ll hopefully get added to a number of playlists, resulting in an increase in streams, saves, and followers. The platform provides a dashboard where you can track which playlists added you and the listener reach of each. Playlist Push curators are incentivized to give honest feedback and can only maintain their status by avoiding botted/fake playlists, so the quality control is fairly high – meaning your music should end up only on legitimate, organic listener playlists.

Pricing: Playlist Push is known to be expensive compared to other tools. The cost of a Spotify playlist campaign starts around $300 at minimum and can go up to $1,000 or more for wider targeting​ (help.playlistpush.com). In fact, the average campaign cost is about $450 for a mid-sized push​. The pricing depends on how many playlists/curators you want to reach – essentially you set your budget and that determines the number of curators they’ll pitch to. (Their website notes that campaigns range from targeting maybe 40 playlists on the low end up to 100+ on the high end.) It’s a one-time cost per campaign, not a subscription. They also offer campaigns for TikTok influencers now, which have a different pricing structure (minimum ~$340). Because of the high minimum budget, Playlist Push is something artists often save up for around a big release, or labels use it to give a single a strong boost.

Pros: The major advantage of Playlist Push is the hands-off convenience and potential scale. Instead of reaching out to curators one by one, you pay once and effectively have a team doing the work for you, hitting dozens of playlists in one go. For a successful campaign, the results can be impressive – we’re talking tens or even hundreds of thousands of new streams if your song gets onto multiple sizable playlists. This can also translate into algorithmic boosts (songs that pick up streams sometimes get noticed by Spotify’s algorithm and land on Discover Weekly, etc.). Playlist Push has a large network of playlist curators (over 1,000 active Spotify playlists in many genres), so it can tap into audiences you might never reach on your own. Another pro is that it’s fairly turnkey; even if you’re not savvy about promotion, you can use their service and see results without needing to personally manage the campaign. The platform also prides itself on real, organic streams – they vet playlists to avoid any that use bots or fake listeners, reducing the risk of you violating Spotify’s terms. Essentially, it’s a Spotify promotion service that tries to do things legitimately and at scale.

Cons: Cost is the biggest con – Playlist Push is a premium service and not feasible for many indie artists on a tight budget. Spending $300-$500 for one song’s promotion is a significant investment. And while many artists do see a good return in streams, there’s no guarantee: you might pay for a campaign and end up on only a handful of small playlists if the curators don’t love the track. (For example, some users report spending around $350 and getting maybe 4-5 playlist adds with under 1k streams – outcomes vary widely.) Unlike some other services, you don’t get detailed feedback from curators through Playlist Push; it’s more of a yes/no placement, so you won’t necessarily know why a lot of curators passed on your song. Also, you don’t get to choose the curators – you’re trusting their algorithm and network to distribute the song, which is less transparent. Another consideration is that Playlist Push only addresses playlisting; it doesn’t help with social media, press, or other aspects of promotion, so it’s best used as part of a bigger strategy. Finally, because it’s focused on Spotify, it won’t directly boost your presence on other platforms (aside from any new fans who seek you out elsewhere). In summary, Playlist Push can be high-risk, high-reward – fantastic if you have the budget and your song resonates with curators, but painful if it doesn’t. Weigh the cost versus potential streaming revenue and exposure before diving in.

4. Groover – Global Curator Network with Guaranteed Feedback

Groover is another popular music submission platform, similar in concept to SubmitHub. Founded in France in 2018, Groover connects artists with a wide network of music curators, including playlist owners, blog reviewers, radio programmers, and even record labels. It has quickly become an up-and-coming alternative for pitching music, especially for those targeting European outlets or looking for guaranteed responses. The core idea is like SubmitHub’s: you submit your track to chosen curators and get a guaranteed listen and feedback. Groover, however, puts its own twist on the model and has attracted a sizable international community of curators (they boast around 1,600 active curators currently on the platform​).

Using Groover is straightforward. You create an artist profile, upload your song (or link), and then you can browse or filter curators by genre, location, type (playlist vs blog, etc.), and even by what they offer (some curators promise a detailed feedback, some offer possible playlist add, some might offer a blog review or even a meeting if they love it). Each submission to a curator on Groover costs a small fee (more on pricing in a moment), which ensures the curator will listen and provide feedback within 7 days. If they like what they hear, they might offer to add your song to their Spotify playlist, write a review, or even discuss further opportunities. If they don’t like it, they’ll still send you a bit of feedback. If a curator fails to respond in time, the credits you spent are refunded to you, maintaining a guarantee that you either hear back or don’t lose your money on that submission.

Pricing: Groover uses its own credit currency called “Grooviz.” 1 Grooviz = €1 (about $1.07 USD), and sending a track to 1 curator costs 2 Grooviz​. In practical terms, each submission is roughly €2 (just over $2). You purchase Grooviz in packages on the site – for example, 10 Grooviz for €10, 20 Grooviz for €20, etc., with larger bundles sometimes giving a small bonus (like extra Grooviz for free) as a discount. So, if you wanted to submit your song to 10 different curators, you’d need 20 Grooviz (~€20). Groover also designates some curators as “Top Curators/Pros,” which cost 4 Grooviz per submission (twice the normal rate) – these are typically high-profile outlets or influencers with big reach. There’s no monthly fee; it’s pay-per-submission, and your credits carry over. This allows you to control your spending per campaign. Many artists might budget something like €30-€50 to pitch a song to 15-25 curators on Groover, for example.

Pros: Groover has quickly earned a good reputation among indie artists for a few reasons. First, the guaranteed response within 7 days is a big plus – it’s reassuring to know you won’t be left waiting indefinitely or wondering. Even more, if a curator doesn’t respond, you automatically get that submission credit back, which is a fair system. Groover’s network is quite broad and international. It’s especially known for its strong base of European curators (France, UK, Italy, etc.), which can be great if you want to reach audiences outside of the U.S. (They certainly have U.S. and global curators too, but the Euro focus is a differentiator.) The platform is user-friendly and actually a bit more streamlined than SubmitHub; some artists find it faster to set up a campaign on Groover because it suggests curators based on your genre and you have slightly fewer toggles to worry about​. Another pro is that Groover encourages curators to provide at least a couple of sentences of constructive feedback, which can sometimes be more insightful than the one-liners elsewhere. In terms of outcomes, artists have reported getting onto Spotify playlists, receiving blog reviews, and even attracting label attention through Groover submissions – so the potential is there. It’s a reliable way to get your music heard by fresh ears, with a decent shot at coverage. Also, Groover occasionally shares success stories and even compiles a “Groover Obsessions” playlist to highlight some of the best tracks they see, giving extra exposure to artists using the platform.

Cons: One of the main critiques of Groover is its Euro-centric user base​. If your goal is primarily to get on U.S.-based Spotify playlists or American music blogs, you might find fewer of those on Groover compared to SubmitHub. It’s not a huge issue (there are U.S. curators there, just not as many), but it means you should pick curators thoughtfully if geography matters to you. Another con is that because Groover’s interface is a bit more simplified, you have less granular control in filtering curators. For example, you set genres at an artist level and get suggestions, but you can’t fine-tune things like “only show curators with X followers” or “sort by approval rate” as deeply as on SubmitHub. This can make the campaign setup quicker, but you sacrifice some targeting precision. In addition, while the feedback is guaranteed, its usefulness can still vary—some curators do write very helpful notes, others might still be brief. And just like any submission platform, there’s no guarantee of acceptance; you might spend €20 and get only feedback and no placements if the song doesn’t click with anyone. The cost per submission ($2) is slightly higher than SubmitHub’s base rate ($1), though there’s no free submission option on Groover (SubmitHub has a slow free route, whereas Groover is entirely paid except occasional promo codes). Lastly, Groover being younger means its curator list (though large) isn’t as exhaustive in certain genres or niches yet, so sometimes you may not find as many outlets that fit your style, depending on what you play. Overall, Groover is a strong, artist-friendly platform that offers a nice alternative or complement to SubmitHub, especially for reaching Europe and getting guaranteed engagement from curators.

Social media promotion is another crucial piece of the music marketing puzzle. While playlist placements can drive streams, it’s equally important to build your fanbase and buzz on social platforms. This is where fan engagement and social promotion tools come in. Services like Hypeddit and ToneDen help artists leverage sites like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok to attract genuine fans. These platforms typically offer smart links, “fan gating” features, and advertising tools to maximize the impact of each release or piece of content. Let’s look at a couple of the leading options in this category and how they compare.

5. Hypeddit – Fan-Gating & Viral Boosting for Independent Artists

Hypeddit is a popular platform designed to help musicians grow their fanbase through social media and streaming engagement. In simpler terms, Hypeddit provides tools that turn listeners into followers, email subscribers, and engaged fans. It’s known for its “fan-gating” feature – where fans can unlock a free download or some exclusive content by performing an action like following you on Spotify or sharing your song. Hypeddit also offers smart links and music landing pages, similar to Feature.fm and ToneDen, but it has carved out a niche especially among electronic and hip-hop artists who used it heavily for SoundCloud growth in its early days. Over time, Hypeddit has expanded its toolkit to be a comprehensive promotional aid for independent artists.

Key features of Hypeddit include: Download Gates (also called fan gates) – you can give away a track or remix and require fans to, say, pre-save your song on Spotify, follow your profile, join your mailing list, or repost a track to access the download. This classic growth hack can rapidly increase your followers and email contacts. They also provide smart link landing pages where you can list all the streaming services for your song (so one link fans click can lead them to Spotify, Apple Music, etc., whichever they prefer). Additionally, Hypeddit has a unique feature where you can promote your music on their fan charts – essentially, if your song is gaining a lot of engagement through Hypeddit, it appears on Hypeddit’s own charts which other users browse, potentially netting you more listens. Recently, Hypeddit introduced an AI-powered music ads feature, which promises to let you run brief Spotify or social media ad campaigns for your track with just a few clicks (the AI helps create and target the ad). For artists who find Facebook/Instagram ads daunting, this is a very attractive shortcut. Beyond that, you get analytics on your campaigns (like how many fans clicked, converted, etc.), integration with email (so you can export those fan emails you collect), and even training resources on music marketing.

Pricing: One great thing about Hypeddit is it offers a Free plan alongside its paid plans. The free tier (sometimes called “Rookie”) allows you to create unlimited smart links and download gates, which is enough to get started and see value. However, the free plan limits you to promoting one music profile at a time and has fewer customization options. The paid tier, previously just called “Pro”, has evolved into multiple tiers. As of 2025, Hypeddit has a Basic plan at $10/month and a Pro plan at $20/month (if paying monthly) – with discounts if you pay yearly.

Originally, Hypeddit’s Pro was around $9/month, so they’ve added a Basic in that range and moved Pro up with more features. The Basic $10/mo plan gives you unlimited use of the core features: unlimited fan gates, pre-saves, smart links, ability to use your own custom domain for links, and basic analytics. The Pro $20/mo (often touted as the best value) includes everything in Basic plus the powerful new goodies: the AI ad campaigns (you can launch those automated Spotify/TikTok/YouTube ads), more in-depth fan analytics and tracking (like a “Spotify Popularity Score” tracker to see how your artist profile is trending), and the ability to run multiple campaigns at once (the free plan only lets you focus on one at a time)​. They even have an Elite plan (~$100/mo) for artists who want personal coaching and live training sessions, but that’s optional and aimed at folks who want a mentorship aspect. Importantly, Hypeddit offers a free trial period for Pro, and often artists find that even one month of Pro around a release can be very fruitful given the low cost.

Pros: Hypeddit’s biggest pro is that it provides growth tools that can go viral with very little cost. The classic example is an artist who uses a download gate: by giving away a free remix, they might gain thousands of new SoundCloud followers or Spotify followers in exchange. It effectively turns your content into a magnet for more engagement. For emerging artists with no marketing team, Hypeddit is like a Swiss Army knife – you get landing pages, pre-save links, and fan gating all in one, which can save money (compared to subscribing to multiple services for these features). Another pro is its simplicity and affordability. The interface is straightforward, and even the Pro plan at $20/mo is cheaper than many other marketing services. You can achieve a lot (build an email list, get playlist pre-saves, grow social media) just with this tool. The new AI ad feature is also a potential game-changer for those who find running Facebook Ads or Google Ads complicated – Hypeddit automates much of it, meaning you could see real Spotify growth from ads without hiring a marketer. Additionally, Hypeddit has an active community and support; the founder is known for publishing tips and even an e-book on music promotion, so there’s a wealth of guidance for users. It’s also worth noting Hypeddit integrates with other platforms nicely (for example, it can drop new fan emails directly into your Mailchimp list). In summary, Hypeddit excels at helping you convert listeners into long-term fans through engagement tactics.

Cons: One drawback is that fan-gating tactics, while effective, need to be used thoughtfully—if overused or done in a spammy way, they can irritate some listeners. (For instance, requiring too many steps might turn people off, or the fans you gain might only be there for the free download, not genuine interest.) So, artists should aim for quality engagement, not just vanity numbers. Hypeddit’s emphasis has historically been on SoundCloud and Spotify; if you’re not active on those, some features (like Hypeddit charts or reposts) might be less impactful. Also, while the AI ads are exciting, they do require you to spend on ad budget in addition to the subscription fee – and the results of those ads can vary. It’s not a full replacement for a well-crafted custom ad campaign; think of it as a quick boost but perhaps not as optimized as what a skilled marketer could do manually. Another minor con: the analytics in Hypeddit, while decent, are not as in-depth as some larger platforms (Feature.fm might offer more detailed breakdowns, for example). And if you’re on the free plan, you might feel the limitations (only one active campaign at a time, Hypeddit branding on your pages, etc.) which is essentially a push to upgrade. Finally, Hypeddit by itself won’t get you on playlists or blogs – it’s more about fan acquisition – so you may still need to use a playlist pitching service in tandem to cover that side of promotion. Overall, however, Hypeddit provides massive value for its cost, and any cons are usually manageable by using the tool smartly.

6. ToneDen – Social Unlocks and Automated Ad Campaigns

ToneDen is a versatile marketing platform that originally gained popularity for its social unlock campaigns – similar to Hypeddit’s fan gates – and has since expanded into a robust suite for social media marketing and event promotion. ToneDen is now closely integrated with Eventbrite (after being acquired), and a part of its feature set is branded as “Eventbrite Boost” focusing on event marketing. However, ToneDen still serves musicians broadly with tools for fan engagement and growth. If you need to run contests, create smart links, or even manage Facebook/Instagram ads, ToneDen has tools for that. It’s often compared with Hypeddit and Feature.fm, as all three offer overlapping services.

Some core features of ToneDen: Social Unlocks – these are customizable actions you ask of fans (like follow on Spotify, like a playlist, join a mailing list, etc.) in exchange for content. For example, you could run a contest where fans get entries by following your profiles or sharing a post. ToneDen’s contest and unlock templates are quite flexible (multi-step unlocks, etc.), which has made it popular with marketing-savvy artists and labels. FanLink pages – like other smart link services, ToneDen lets you create a clean landing page for your song or album, listing all streaming platforms. You can use a custom URL and even embed Facebook Pixel or other tracking for retargeting. Advertising – ToneDen shines in simplifying social media ads. It has an “Automated Ads” feature where you can set up campaigns to promote your Spotify, SoundCloud, events, etc., with guided targeting. In essence, it tries to take the complexity out of Facebook Ads Manager and give you an easier interface to run music-related ads. It even can automatically send DMs to people who engage with your ads, etc., to further convert them (some advanced Growth Suite features). Additionally, ToneDen offers analytics for your campaigns and social growth, and it integrates with platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and more. Many independent promoters and even record labels have used ToneDen for running pre-save campaigns and giveaway contests (for instance, “win tickets to my show if you follow on Spotify” – ToneDen will handle verifying the actions and drawing winners).

Pricing: ToneDen has a tiered pricing model. There is a Free plan that lets you access basic features like creating unlimited FanLink pages (smart links), social unlocks (contests/gates), and even some messaging to Facebook Messenger subscribers​ (gitbook.toneden.io). However, the free plan will include ToneDen’s branding on your campaign pages and has some limits on advanced features. The paid plans are: Basic at $50/month and Pro at $100/month​. The Basic $50/mo removes the ToneDen branding (so your links look more professional) and unlocks “all social integrations” with multi-step unlocks, meaning you can combine several actions in one campaign (e.g., follow on multiple platforms). It also allows unlimited messaging to your contacts (ToneDen can capture Facebook/IG followers and let you send them messages about new releases). Basic also likely includes a modest ad spend limit for the ad tool (the snippet suggests a $500/month ad spend limit with Basic)​. The Pro $100/mo plan raises those caps – for example, higher or no ad spend limits – and adds the full suite of advanced features, possibly including their “Growth Suite” which might be an extra $50 add-on as mentioned in some of their docs​. Growth Suite features could include more powerful automation and better audience targeting (like lookalike audience generation and retargeting sequences). To summarize, ToneDen is free to use at a basic level, but to fully leverage it (especially the advertising tools without cap), you’re looking at a relatively high monthly cost compared to Hypeddit or Feature.fm.

Pros: ToneDen is highly versatile and can be a one-stop shop for social promotion and advertising. For artists or teams who know what they want to accomplish (be it growing Instagram followers, running a pre-save campaign, selling tickets, etc.), ToneDen provides templates and automation to do it efficiently. The ad campaign automation is a big plus – it effectively demystifies Facebook Ads and Google Ads for music promotion. For instance, you can quickly set up an ad to promote your Spotify track to people who like similar artists, with a few clicks, and ToneDen will optimize it over time. This can save a lot of time and potentially money (by avoiding poorly targeted ads). The social unlock/contest feature is one of the best in class, offering more customization than some competitors. Another pro is that ToneDen’s free tier is pretty generous in terms of core functionality (unlimited FanLinks and simple gates), which means an artist can start using it without paying and only upgrade when they need more. For those who also do live shows or DJ events, ToneDen/Boost integrates that promotion as well, which is a unique benefit – you can manage your event ads and music ads in one place. The platform also has a modern, clean UI and provides solid analytics dashboards, so you can see how your campaigns are performing across different channels.

Cons: The obvious con with ToneDen is the price point for advanced features. $50 or $100 a month is steep for many independent artists, especially when other platforms offer many similar features for less. Often, ToneDen is used by indie labels or artists who have a budget and multiple releases to promote continuously, to justify that cost. If you’re only running a few campaigns a year, you might subscribe for a month or two at a time or stick to the free version. Another con is complexity: while ToneDen simplifies a lot of marketing tasks, it still helps to have some marketing knowledge to get the most out of it. It’s a tool built by marketers, so it assumes you have certain goals (like building a funnel of fans or retargeting an audience). Beginners might find the number of options overwhelming or not know how to fully exploit, say, the audience manager or messaging features. Additionally, because ToneDen has such a broad scope (it’s not just for music but also events, etc.), some parts of the interface or documentation might feel less tailored to pure music promotion compared to something like Hypeddit which is laser-focused on artists. Finally, keep in mind that ToneDen (especially at the paid tiers) is really worth it if you plan to use the automated ad spending; if you don’t run ads, you might be underutilizing what you paid for. In essence, ToneDen is powerful but can be overkill for artists who only need simple promo links or occasional contests. It’s best suited for those actively running campaigns and willing to invest in consistent marketing.

7. Feature.fm – Comprehensive Marketing & Advertising Platform for Music

Feature.fm is a leading platform offering a wide array of music marketing tools, used by both major label artists and indies. If you’re looking for a professional-grade solution to manage your song links, pre-saves, ad campaigns, and fan data, Feature.fm likely has a feature for it. It’s known as one of the first companies to provide “smart links” specifically for music, and it has since expanded into areas like native advertising on streaming services and detailed fan analytics. Many compare Feature.fm vs ToneDen vs Hypeddit as they overlap, but Feature.fm tends to be praised for its depth of analytics and its focus on the music industry’s needs (they even power some major label campaigns).

Feature.fm’s toolbox includes: Smart Links and Landing Pages – customizable landing pages for releases that include links to every streaming service. They also allow embedded audio previews, and you can collect emails or let fans “favorite” the release to be notified. Pre-Save campaigns – Feature.fm was an early pre-save provider; fans can pre-save on Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, etc. and you can often have the link auto-switch to a live link after release. They even allow capturing the emails of those who pre-save (with user permission) which is great for building your contact list. Action Pages – these are interactive landing pages where you ask fans to perform certain actions (like follow on Spotify, subscribe on YouTube, etc.) and then reward them with something (like access to a secret video or entry into a contest). It’s similar to social unlocks, and you can have multiple actions on one page. Advertising – Feature.fm has a unique offering where you can promote your music through native ads on various platforms. For example, they have or had partnerships where your song can be played as a sponsored track on services like Deezer or Audiomack. They also provide a system for creating banner ads or audio ads targeted to music fans. The platform can manage and optimize these ads across different channels, and you can track conversions (like how many people listened, saved the song, etc., from the ad). Fan Base Management – integrated CRM-style features to segment and manage your fan contacts. If you collect fan emails through your smart links, Feature.fm lets you tag and organize these (like separate lists for “fans who pre-saved my last single” or “fans in NYC area” etc.). This ties into analytics where you get insights on where your clicks are coming from, which marketing channel is most effective, and even how your Spotify follower count or stream count moves over time with your campaigns. In short, Feature.fm tries to be the full-stack solution for a data-driven music marketer.

Pricing: Feature.fm offers a free tier and then several paid tiers. The Free plan allows basic use of smart links and a simple pre-save, with limited insight data (maybe 7 days of analytics, etc.). For artists serious about marketing, their paid plans are:Artist at $19/month, Pro Artist at $39/month​, and then custom enterprise plans for labels (often around $199/month for the “Marketer” tier as listed on their site). The Artist ($19/mo) plan is geared towards “growing artists” and includes advanced marketing tools like unlimited smart links, unlimited action pages, and more detailed analytics (probably 30 days or more of data retention)​. The Pro Artist ($39/mo) gives full access to all features, such as extended data retention (unlimited insights), conversion tracking (so you can see exactly how many pre-savers actually streamed the song later, etc.), more action page options, and priority support​. Both paid plans often come with a free trial period (14 days) so you can test the features. If you pay annually, they usually give a discount (~10% off). One thing to note: certain ad campaign features in Feature.fm might require additional budget (for example, if you run a sponsored song campaign, you’d still pay for the ad spend itself on top of the subscription). But the subscription covers the use of the tools and analytics.

Pros: Feature.fm is highly regarded for its robust analytics and integration. It gives you a very detailed picture of your audience engagement. For instance, when you use a Feature.fm smart link, you can see not just clicks, but if those clicks led to a stream or save on Spotify (thanks to their Spotify integration). This kind of conversion data is gold for understanding what marketing efforts actually lead to listeners. The platform’s smart links are very polished and highly customizable – you can use your own domain, edit the appearance, and even embed pixel trackers for Facebook or Google to retarget those fans with ads later​. The breadth of tools is another pro: you don’t need separate services for links, pre-saves, and email capture – Feature.fm bundles them, which can save time and ensure all your data is in one place. Their native ad opportunities (like sponsored songs) are fairly unique; few other services offer a way to get your music directly in front of new listeners within streaming apps. Additionally, Feature.fm’s interface, while powerful, is user-friendly considering the depth – they provide templates and guidance. For artists who have multiple releases a year or small labels, the Pro plan can handle multiple artists under one account, making it cost-effective to manage campaigns in one dashboard. Also, since major labels have used Feature.fm, there’s a level of trust and reliability; the platform is stable and continuously evolving with industry needs. Overall, it’s praised as a professional-grade music marketing solution that independent artists can tap into at a reasonable cost.

Cons: For a newcomer or a DIY artist just starting out, Feature.fm might feel a bit overwhelming or more than you actually need. Some of its most powerful features (like conversion tracking or fan segmentation) require that you already have a decent funnel of fans and traffic – if you’re only getting 100 clicks, the deep analytics might not be as crucial yet. The price, while fair for the features, is higher than beginner tools; $19 or $39 a month can be a stretch if you’re not actively releasing music or using the features constantly. Another con is that some users have noted limits on the free plan that push you to upgrade – for example, on the free tier you might only get a week of data and maybe can’t capture emails without an upgrade, so the free plan is mostly to test the waters. Also, if you exceed certain usage (like email sends or number of contacts) on the Artist plan, you might need Pro or higher, which can suddenly bump up the cost. Compared to Hypeddit or others, Feature.fm lacks the built-in “community” aspect (no chart or built-in audience to leverage) – it’s purely a tool, not a network. Another thing to consider: while Feature.fm has ad capabilities, running those campaigns still requires an ad budget and some experimentation; it’s not a magic bullet for getting streams without investment. In terms of playlist pitching, Feature.fm itself doesn’t pitch to curators (despite what one might interpret from their site – that reference to featuring music on blogs was somewhat misleading in an earlier snippet). So you’ll still need a separate approach for actually getting on playlists or blogs; Feature.fm will help you market around the release (which indirectly can lead to more attention). Lastly, some artists might find the learning curve steep if they aren’t familiar with marketing concepts – there are a lot of options and metrics, which can be confusing without some background. However, Feature.fm does offer tutorials and support to help. In summary, the cons are mostly about fit and complexity – Feature.fm is extremely powerful, but you need to make sure you’ll use that power to justify it. For those who do, it can significantly amplify a release’s impact.

8. ReverbNation – Established Platform for Opportunities and Promotion

ReverbNation has been around for well over a decade and was once the go-to hub for independent musicians. While its prominence has waned in the age of streaming, it still offers a comprehensive suite of tools and services for artist promotion. ReverbNation is a bit different from the other names on this list – it’s part social network, part EPK builder, part gig finder, and part music promotion service. They’ve positioned themselves as a platform that helps artists get heard by industry professionals and find opportunities like festivals, licensing, and playlists.

Features of ReverbNation include: an Artist Profile/EPK (Electronic Press Kit) – you can upload your songs, photos, upcoming shows, and create a public profile which has its own fan following mechanism within ReverbNation. This was a big draw early on, as fans could follow artists and leave comments, etc., on the platform (somewhat like a MySpace for music vibe). They have tools for email newsletters, fan capture (people can become your “fan” on RN and you get their email), and even a website builder for artists. Promotion-wise, ReverbNation’s unique offering is their “Opportunities” marketplace. Artists can submit (often for free or a small fee) to things like performance slots at festivals, song placement in TV/film, being featured on a curated playlist or compilation, radio spots, and more. These opportunities are curated and often provided by external partners; ReverbNation basically facilitates the submission process. For example, a festival might partner with RN to accept submissions for bands to play a stage – you’d submit your profile through ReverbNation for consideration. Another area is ReverbNation’s Crowd Review (called Crowd Review or previously “Audiokite” integration) – you can pay to have ordinary listeners review your song and get a report (useful for gauging song potential). Additionally, ReverbNation offers digital distribution (like a Tunecore or DistroKid, they can put your music on Spotify/Apple, etc.), promotional add-ons like Spotlight (to be featured on ReverbNation’s homepage or newsletters), and even a paid service where their team will run an ad campaign for you (this is more like a managed service). They really aimed to be an all-in-one for artists’ online presence and growth.

Pricing: ReverbNation has a free membership option, but most of the valuable features are part of their paid plans. The typical Premium plan runs about $12.95 per month (or around $9.95 if paid annually). The premium membership unlocks things like the EPK builder, advanced stats on your profile (who’s listening, etc.), ability to submit to all the opportunities (some opportunities are only available to premium members), and use of their tools like the fan reach emails and website builder. They also have a Pro package at a higher price if you include distribution (for instance, for around $19.95/mo they might include distributing your releases to Spotify, etc., plus the promotional tools). Specific opportunities sometimes have submission fees (e.g. $5 to submit to a certain contest), but many are included with the membership. The free tier limits you to basic profile and some local opportunities; serious users usually opt for the premium.

Pros: ReverbNation’s strength lies in its comprehensive approach – it tries to handle every aspect of an artist’s career. For someone starting from scratch, it can be a one-stop platform: you can build a web presence, grow a fan mailing list, and find opportunities without needing separate services. The Opportunities marketplace is a unique pro; it’s a centralized place to discover chances to get your music in front of industry ears. Some artists have landed festival gigs, opening slots for bigger acts, or licensing deals thanks to ReverbNation submissions. It’s also somewhat community-oriented – there are charts and rankings by locale/genre on ReverbNation, which can be motivating (artists often proudly say “#1 on the ReverbNation chart for my city”). Another advantage is that ReverbNation has a long-standing database of industry contacts – if they choose you for an opportunity, it might mean a reputable company is hearing your stuff. Their EPK and website tools save artists from needing to code their own site or pay for separate hosting. Essentially, if you don’t have a personal website or a PR agent, a ReverbNation profile can function as your press kit when reaching out to venues or media. They also have a large user base, so occasionally fans or talent scouts browsing ReverbNation might discover artists (less common nowadays, but still possible). For those who do live shows, ReverbNation’s gig finder and affiliation with promoters can be quite helpful in connecting you to bookings. In short, it’s a veteran platform that offers reliability and a bit of everything an artist might need.

Cons: In recent years, ReverbNation has lost some relevancy as artists and fans migrated more to mainstream social media (Instagram, TikTok) and streaming platforms. The fan engagement on ReverbNation itself isn’t what it used to be – people aren’t creating RN accounts just to follow bands like they did a decade ago. So the social aspect is limited now. Also, some of the opportunities can feel like “pay-to-play” or long shots; there are far more artists applying than slots available, so you might submit to dozens of opportunities and hear nothing back. It’s somewhat akin to a lottery for big chances (though someone has to win). The platform’s design and approach can also feel dated compared to newer, slicker tools. The charts and badges, etc., sometimes give a vanity metric that doesn’t necessarily translate to real-world success – being #1 in your city on RN doesn’t equal a huge Spotify following, for instance. Another con is that many of ReverbNation’s services (EPK, email, even distro) can be done through alternative modern services often at lower cost or with more flexibility (for example, Bandzoogle for websites/EPK, Mailchimp for email, DistroKid for distribution, etc.). If an artist already uses those, ReverbNation might be redundant. The cost of the membership can also add up if you’re not actively using the features – paying ~$120/year might not be worth it just to have a profile if you’re not leveraging the opportunities or tools. Additionally, the distribution service via ReverbNation Pro is functional but not as widely used as dedicated distributors; some features like instant Spotify for Artists access or YouTube Content ID might not be as smooth. Finally, ReverbNation lacks direct Spotify playlist pitching or modern algorithmic promotion – it’s from a slightly earlier mindset of music promotion (focused on industry gatekeepers and press, rather than playlisters and algorithms). Therefore, it’s best seen as a supplement to your digital strategy, not the center of it. ReverbNation is valuable for specific things (like EPK and opportunities), but you’ll still need to engage fans on mainstream platforms for broad growth.

9. SoundCampaign – Spotify Playlist Promotion Service

SoundCampaign is a newer entrant that, like Playlist Push, specializes in connecting artists with Spotify playlist curators in exchange for a fee. It positions itself as a more approachable and perhaps cost-effective way to get genuine playlist placements on Spotify. Essentially, SoundCampaign is another playlist pitching service, where you pay to have your song sent to a number of playlist curators who have signed up to the platform. The curators listen and provide feedback, and if they enjoy the track, they add it to their playlists.

The way SoundCampaign works is: you submit your song (must already be released on Spotify) and set up a campaign by choosing some genre tags and preferences. SoundCampaign has an algorithm that matches your song with suitable curators from their network. You also allocate a budget for the campaign – the more you budget, the more curators they’ll include (and potentially the larger the playlists). During the campaign, curators will rate and comment on your song. You’ll receive a report with their feedback and see which playlists (if any) added the track. SoundCampaign emphasizes “real and organic” playlists, and they claim to carefully vet curators (so no fake followers). Unlike Playlist Push’s all-or-nothing approach, SoundCampaign allows some flexibility in budget and scale, which can be friendlier to indie artists.

Pricing: SoundCampaign’s pricing is budget-based. The minimum budget to start a campaign is around $150-$200, which might reach a smaller set of curators. They suggest packages on their site (for example, a standard campaign maybe ~$299, a larger one $499, etc.), but you can adjust how much you want to spend. Essentially, the more you pay, the more curators you’ll be matched with. According to some sources, they also have a policy of refunding credits for curators who didn’t provide feedback, etc., ensuring you get what you pay for. It’s a one-time campaign payment, not a subscription. This can be more accessible than Playlist Push’s $300 minimum – often artists might test SoundCampaign with say $200 and see how it goes.

Pros: SoundCampaign has been praised for its user-friendly approach and professional support. Artists often highlight that the feedback from curators is delivered to them, so even if they don’t get a ton of adds, they learn something from the responses. It’s considered a legitimate Spotify promotion service in that they explicitly forbid any bots or artificial play inflation – everything comes from real playlist listeners. Because you can start with a smaller budget, it’s seen as a lower-risk trial compared to some competitors. The platform interface will show you each curator’s rating of your song and their comments, adding transparency. If your song does well, curators add it, which can lead to a nice boost in streams and followers during the campaign. Some artists have reported getting added to a dozen playlists and seeing thousands of new streams as a result of a moderately priced campaign. Another pro is that SoundCampaign actively curates their curator network – if curators give consistently poor or irrelevant feedback or have underperforming playlists, SoundCampaign can drop them. This helps maintain quality control. Also, they operate in a way that attempts to stay within Spotify’s rules (curators are paid a small amount for their time to review and feedback, not explicitly for adding songs, which avoids payola issues). Dedicated approach: SoundCampaign’s team often gives advice on how to improve your song’s appeal or how to better target your campaign next time, which is a nice touch of customer service in a largely automated field.

Cons: While potentially cheaper than Playlist Push, SoundCampaign is still a paid promotion with no guarantee of playlist placement quantity. You might spend a couple hundred dollars and end up on only a few minor playlists if the song isn’t well-received – that outcome could be disappointing and not a great ROI in terms of streams or followers. The success of the campaign heavily depends on the appeal of the track and whether it matches the curators’ needs. Another con is that many of the playlists in such networks are medium-sized at best (few thousand followers). Landing on them may boost your play count modestly, but it might not skyrocket your popularity unless some bigger playlists pick it up. Also, like any playlist pitching, once the campaign period is over, many playlists will eventually rotate your song out, so the spike in streams can be temporary if not accompanied by other marketing efforts. There’s also the philosophical debate: some in the music community feel that paying curators (even just for feedback) toes an ethical line – essentially, it’s a form of paid placement, so you’ll want to ensure any service like this fits within your personal marketing ethos. On a practical note, SoundCampaign currently focuses on Spotify; it doesn’t directly address promotion on other platforms (though success on Spotify can spill over elsewhere). So, it’s narrower in scope than an all-in-one platform. Finally, as with any “middleman” service, results can vary – some artists rave about it, some see little value. Managing expectations is key: SoundCampaign can help get your song in front of Spotify curators, but it won’t miraculously make a song go viral if it doesn’t connect with listeners. It’s best used when you have a high-quality track in a clear genre that you genuinely think playlist curators and audiences will love, and you just need that foot in the door to be heard.

10. Other Notable Music Promotion Services

Beyond the major tools detailed above, there are several other music promotion services and platforms worth mentioning. Each caters to specific needs or niches within music marketing. Here’s a quick look at a few additional options:

• Omari MC Promotion – Omari MC is a music promoter and YouTuber who offers paid promotion packages for artists. His services range from Spotify playlist pitching, YouTube video promotion (through ads and channel placements), to social media growth. Omari’s packages often bundle multiple outlets (for example, for a set price he and his team will promote your song to a certain number of playlists, run Instagram campaigns, etc.). The pros are that it’s a hands-off service and Omari is transparent on his YouTube channel about how they promote (often via ads and network contacts). However, results vary, and some artists question the quality of certain playlist placements. It’s an option to consider for those who prefer someone else doing the work – essentially an independent agency approach to promotion.

• MusoSoup – MusoSoup takes a different angle on blog and playlist promotion. With MusoSoup, artists pay a small fee (around £24, roughly $30) to have their new release listed on the MusoSoup platform for a period (usually 45 days). During that time, bloggers, playlisters, and other influencers who use MusoSoup can listen to all the listed tracks and choose ones they want to feature. If they select your song, they’ll typically post a review or add it to a playlist, and in return they ask you to “tip” them a small amount (usually £3-£5) or share their content. The benefit is that one fee can potentially lead to multiple write-ups or placements if your song catches interest, making it quite cost-effective. It also guarantees any coverage is merit-based (curators choose what they like). Cons: if no curators pick your track, you might end up with no results (though you still got some exposure to them). Also, you have to monitor the platform for responses and follow up. MusoSoup is great for those seeking blog coverage and smaller playlist adds in a budget-friendly way.

• Boost Collective – Boost Collective is an emerging platform that offers a mix of free and paid promo, primarily focused on Spotify playlists. They have an interesting model where artists can earn credits by doing certain tasks (like sharing playlists or referring friends) and then spend those credits to get their songs placed on playlists. They also offer direct paid placements on playlists they manage. Pros: Some artists enjoy the community aspect and the fact that you can potentially get promotion without money by using the platform actively. It also offers distribution services, claiming if you distribute through them, they’ll promote your music for free on their playlists. Cons: The playlists involved are often smaller and sometimes the “free” placements are on collaborative playlists with varying effectiveness. As always, caution is advised to ensure any playlist placements are genuine. Boost Collective is a creative option for very budget-conscious artists who have more time than money.

• SubmitHub Alternatives – There are other submission platforms like SubmitLink (Submit.lnk) and IndieMono (for free playlist submissions), etc. SubmitLink is a newer site similar to SubmitHub/Groover, though not as established yet. IndieMono and Daily Playlists are free sites where you can submit to user playlists; they can be worth a try since they only cost your time, but keep expectations modest.

• Social Media Marketing Services – For those focusing on social media growth, services like Fanbaze, Artisto Media, or even hiring a freelancer can help run your TikTok or Instagram campaigns. These aren’t music-specific platforms but rather marketing services that might specialize in music clientele. They can run influencer campaigns or hashtag challenges to boost a song on socials. The key here is to thoroughly vet any service and ensure they use organic, Terms-of-Service-compliant methods (no fake followers or spam).

Each of these notable services has its own strategy and focus. Depending on your goals – whether it’s getting press coverage, boosting Spotify numbers, or growing your social media – you might explore one or more of them. Always do a bit of research and, if possible, start with a small test campaign to gauge results before investing heavily.

As an artist, you don’t have to rely on just one tool; in fact, using a combination often yields the best outcome. For example, you might use un:hurd or Feature.fm to plan your release and set up marketing materials, SubmitHub or Groover to reach curators for press and playlists, and Hypeddit or ToneDen to build your follower counts and run ads – all while engaging your audience on social media and live shows. The ideal mix depends on your budget, genre, and where your fanbase lives online.

Conclusion: Choosing the Best Music Promotion Services for Your Needs

In the digital era, promoting your music online is both crucial and more achievable than ever, thanks to the variety of platforms at your disposal. We’ve covered playlist promotion services (like SubmitHub, Playlist Push, Groover, SoundCampaign) that can boost your streams and visibility on Spotify, as well as social media-oriented tools (like Hypeddit and ToneDen) that help convert listeners into loyal fans. Comprehensive platforms such as un:hurd stand out by combining many of these functions – guiding you through every step and consolidating your efforts for maximum impact.

When deciding which music promotion tools to use, consider your goals, music genre, and budget. If you’re looking to build long-term fan engagement and want an all-in-one solution, an option like un:hurd music (our top recommendation) can provide a balanced campaign across playlists, ads, and analytics​ (unhurdmusic.com). On the other hand, if your immediate aim is to get on Spotify playlists and you have a specific budget, a focused service like SoundCampaign or a credit-based approach via SubmitHub might be effective. Many successful independent artists use a layered strategy: for instance, kickstarting a release with playlist adds (to drive initial stream counts), then using smart links and social campaigns to promote your music online to new listeners who discover you, and finally engaging those new fans with emails, live streams, or more content.

It’s important to maintain realistic expectations and track your results. A tool can open doors and create opportunities, but the music itself and how you connect with listeners will ultimately determine how far you go. Also, monitor the data each platform provides – learn which songs resonate the most, which playlists or blogs drive the most engagement, and where your fans are coming from. This will help you refine future campaigns for even better outcomes.

In summary, the “best” music promotion service is the one that aligns with your current needs and amplifies your efforts. Un:hurd shines as an excellent first choice because it allows artists to take control of their whole marketing process in one place, from planning to execution, leveraging data to make informed decisions. But every service listed here has its strengths – perhaps Hypeddit’s fan-gating will explode your following, or a Groover submission will catch a label’s attention, or Feature.fm’s analytics will guide your tour planning. By fairly comparing features, pricing, pros and cons, we can see that each tool has a role to play in an artist’s journey.

Ultimately, effective music promotion is about creating momentum. These platforms are like fuel – they can spark that momentum when used wisely. As you experiment with these promotion tools, keep making great music and engaging with your audience genuinely. Over 2,000 words later, the takeaway is this: you have more power than ever to push your music from “unheard” to un:hurd and beyond, so take advantage of these services and let the world discover your sound!

Resources:

• [Source] Music Business Worldwide – “Artist marketing platform un:hurd music attracts fresh investment from EMPIRE” (February 2025)​

  musicbusinessworldwide.com

  
  

• [Source] Two Story Melody – “The Top 6 Music Submission Sites in 2023” (SubmitHub, Groover, Playlist Push, etc.)​

  twostorymelody.com

  
  

• [Source] Playlist Push Help Center – “How much does a campaign cost?”​

  help.playlistpush.com

  
  

• [Source] Two Story Melody – “Hypeddit vs. ToneDen vs. FeatureFM: An Overview & Pricing Breakdown”​

  twostorymelody.com

  
  

• [Source] Magnetic Magazine – “7 Alternatives To Playlist Push: Top Choices For Spotify Playlist Promotion” (includes SoundCampaign)​

  magneticmag.com

  
  

• [Source] Groover FAQ – “Do I have to pay to use Groover?”​

  twostorymelody.com